Stolen from Matthew by Darwin!Public Domain
Even Darwin's famous tree was stolen from Matthew's (1831) unique explanatory concept of ramifying branches to explain how species are descended form a common ancestor.
Figure 2 from Nullius in Verba: Darwin's Greatest Secret.
Dr Mike Sutton and Thinker Media IncUsed only with express written permission
The Converging Ramifications of Matthew's (1831) prior published theory provides independently verifiable dis-confirming evidence for the Darwinist myth that Darwin and Wallace immaculately conceived the exact same complex theory, its name, and the same unique examples to explain it.
Charles Darwin had about as much originality as a trailer park!
Hopping-mad pseudo-scholarly Darwinists, apparently, do not wish you to know that the newly discovered story of the world's greatest science fraud is available on Kindle, all e-reading devices and PC's: here.
For the past 154 years, ignoring the fundamental principle of nullius in verba, credulous Darwin worshipers have meekly swallowed a host of Darwin's un-evidenced fallacious rhetoric and downright lies about Patrick Matthew - the true originator of the full hypothesis of natural selection.
Thinker Media IncUsed only with express written permission
Nullius in Verba
The explanation for the figure (Figure 2) in this blog is on Kindle: here, and is taken from the book that establishes with new - independently verifiable hard evidence - that it is now more likely than not that Darwin and Wallace plagiarized Matthew's prior published hypothesis and that each lied when they claimed no prior knowledge of it.
Contrary to the myth, started by Darwin that no one read Matthew's book, newly conducted BigData analysis reveals that 25 people cited it. Seven of those 25 were naturalists. Four of those naturalists were known to Darwin/Wallace. Three of those naturalists known to Darwin/Wallace played major roles at the epicenter of influence and facilitation on the pre-1858 work of Darwin and Wallace. A plagiarism analysis reveals Darwin and Wallace used the same phrases as Matthew, replicated his unique ideas and even copied his highly idiosyncratic explanatory examples. Darwin even uniquely four word shuffled Matthew's unique name for his discovery!
In sum, Nullius in Verba: Darwin's Greatest Secret reveals - in my opinion - that both Darwin and Wallace, more likely than not, committed the world's greatest science fraud and then both lied to conceal it. The shame of it! And shame on the pseudo-scholarly, daft-as-a-brush, fanatical, Darwin-worship Industry, and the credulous eminent Darwinists who it run it for vainglorious profit, for carelessly hoodwinking us all for so long!