Adobe StockUsed only with express written permission
Readers of this blog post might know I have a rather long-term issue with the fact that a number of Wikipedia editors are actively and "tautologically" engaged in their own pseudo-scholarly personal agenda bias-driven campaigns to delete significant facts that do not fit those personal fact-deleting agendas. (e.g here and here and here). And, best of the lot: Here.
I am somewhat amazed to see that the Encyclopedia Britannica is rallying and is prepared to publish the facts on Patrick Matthew.
A video caught within a video
This video shows us one of these petty martinet-types being consensually caught in a video net of his own silly making. An aggrieved maker of his own YouTube video, which captures this Wikipedia editor's video that depicts the "editor's" apparently weirdly self-satisfied celebration of his undereducated, proudly inexpert, arrogant and illogical ne'erdowell self, is rightfully aggrieved in my opinion. The Wikipedia editor in question also reveals in his video that Wikipedia is effectively a weird cult with a labyrinthine set of unintuitive rules, which include - apparently - denying Americans their constitutional rights to assert their rights to seek redress when those rights are being denied.
Stick with the whole thing. You might need a stiff drink to endure it to the bitter end, but I think it is well worth watching and thinking about - if only for the next, or first, time you wonder why someone weirdly deleted your own significant and evidence-based veracious entry on a Wikipedia page.
Bob Butler CEO of Thinker Media
WARNING: In my opinion, this video of a Wikipedia, daft as a brush, woolly-headed, crack-pot who can't think straight, editor, is toe-curlingly excruciating. Click to view it Here.
The same aggrieved YouTube video maker "Gary" has more fact-based evidence of Wikipediapropaganda for us. WARNING: Gary asserts his constitutional right to use the obscene four letter female genitalia "C" word in his video. My link to it does not represent approval of such language to abuse others. In fact, my opinion is that I greatly disapprove of such language being used in such a way. But, just like Gary, I hate brute censorship based on mere opinions. So here it is. Right: Here.
If you wish to see Gary's website that Wikipedia editors deleted the Wikipedia link to. It is here.
Wikipedia on Patrick Matthew
Currently, despite it being a100 per cent proven fact, published in two peer reviewed journal articles (Sutton 2014,and Sutton 2016), that Charles Darwin lied about the prior readership of the original ideas Matthew's book, Wikipedia editors systematically delete that fact whenever anyone tries to add it to the Patrick Matthew page on Wikipedia. Just look at the editing history page to see what the fact deleting Wikipedia Editor Clowns have been getting up to.
Wikipedia is ultimately controlled and edited by its paid "hobby-horse" unqualified, biased and gleefully under-educated chip-shouldered administrators.