Identity Verified Thinker in Science / Social Sciences / Sociology
Mike Sutton
Mike Sutton
Dr Mike Sutton is the author of 'Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret'.
Posted in Science / Social Sciences / Sociology

A Most Very Curious "Bombshell" Coincidence?

Jul. 20, 2015 4:29 am
Categories: Dysology

Now here's a curious thing


Public Domain

Patrick Matthew (1831) was the first to fully explain natural selection as new species branching from a common ancestor by way of nature selecting varieties that were best circumstance suited. He even uniquely called it: 'the natural process of selection'. A term Darwin (1859) would uniquely four word shuffle into 'process of natural selection'.


Public Domain

Patrick Matthew: The biological father of the theory of natural selection

When I added explanatory text to explain an image of Patrick Matthew's trees, from his 1831 book 'On Naval Timber and Arboriculture' - on a blog post - there is absolutely no way I could have known what shape - if any - the words under the image would form. Anyone who has written on BestThinking, and the CEO - Bob Butler - can affirm that fact. Because the software permits us to enter words in a straight line only.

What is curious, therefore, is that the words formed the pattern of a bombshell! That is all the more curious, because, Professor Donald Forsdyke had earlier described Matthew's original published discovery of natural selection as "a bombshell".

I have since manged to replicate the coincidental effect on my website by manipulating the text on screen.

Coincidences happen, which is why we have a word for it. I think this one is particularly fun.Dr Mike Weale has one about Matthew and Darwin - or perhaps not (as the case may be) on The Patrick Matthew Project,

There are currently no comments. to Shut Down Permanently on December 31, 2017

If you want to save a copy of your content, you must do so before the website shuts down on December 31, 2017. We will NOT be able to provide any assistance after the website shuts down. We are available at only until the shutdown to provide more information and assistance.

It was a noble 10-year experiment, but it turns out that the writers with the best content are the least adept at the tech required to publish under our model, which in hindsight, makes perfect sense. If you are dedicating your life to becoming an expert in your specialty, you don’t have a lot of time left for figuring out publishing tech.

It hasn't helped that we have entered an age of unprecedented polarization and antagonism which doesn't foster demand for a website dedicated to the respectful engagement of diverse views.

Thank you, everyone!

Latest Thinking in Science
Latest Ebooks