Identity Verified Thinker in Science / Social Sciences / Sociology
Mike Sutton
Mike Sutton
Dr Mike Sutton is the author of 'Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret'.
 

Categories

This Blog has no active categories.
 
Close  
Posted in Society / Religion / Atheism

Is the Dawkinite Meme a Gift from "God"?

Mar. 17, 2015 5:51 am
image

Trumpet from the heavens abovePublic Domain

God

Reducing-down my book Nullius in Verba to an article, to a blog post,to a shorter blog post, to the blog you are reading, we obtain a new argument of substance. We have arrived at the evolutionary creation of a new species of meme. I have coined it "Dawkinite".

The word "Dawkinite" existed before my 2015 deployment, but not the concept of Dawkinite as intellectual Kryptonite for Dawkins, Dawkinites and all atheist Darwinists.

The Dawkinite Meme

The Dawkinite Meme is that Richard Dawkins, along with other prominent atheist Darwinists, believes in miracles but vociferously criticizes religions for encouraging people to believe in miracles. Allow me to explain why:

At the most basic level, a miracle depends upon its happening being such a highly improbable event that only a supernatural explanation could account for it being veracious. The Virgin Mary's conception of Jesus of Nazareth being fathered by a supernatural deity, whilst surrounded by fertile men, is one example of Christian miracle belief in just such an improbable event, which they believe really happened.

Darwinists Really do Believe Darwin and Wallace Discovered Natural Selection Theory Independently of it's Cited and Reviewed Prior-Publication

The Darwinist belief in Darwin's and Wallace's independent immaculate virgin-brain cognitive conceptions of Patrick Matthew's prior published theory, whilst influenced and surrounded by men who had read it, is an example of Darwinist miracle belief. The Blessed Virgins Darwin and Wallace Dual Immaculate Conception of a Prior Published Theory Miracle could have happened only if some supernatural force stopped those around Darwin and Wallace, who had read and cited it, from telling them about the one book in the world they most needed to read. Moreover, it could only have happened as a miracle because Darwin and Wallace miraculously replicated so much that was uniquely in it,while claiming none they knew had read it. You can see more on the topic here in my position paper on what the New Data means for Darwinism.

Perhaps these hypocritically irrational atheist Darwinists do not really love rationality, logic and science at all. I think it is Darwin they really love. I wonder, is Darwin a proxy God for these particular atheists?

image

(c) Darwin and WallaceAttribution

Miracle Double Immaculate Conceptions of the Blessed Virgins Darwin and Wallace of Matthew's prior published hypothesis of natural selection

The Dawkinite Meme

Darwinists have, for over 155 years, credulously deified Darwin as an independent discoverer of a prior-published theory. They have done this at the expense of the reputation of science. Today, the New Data proves Matthew's prior published hypothesis of natural selection was read by those who are known to have influenced Darwin. This new hard fact reveals that Darwinists such as Richard Dawkins, who deny stubbornly the increased probability of Matthewian knowledge contamination, now believe credulously in a highly improbable event, which is the equivalent of Christian miracle-belief in the virgin birth of Jesus. This is Dawkinite!

This Dawkinite meme is the equivalent of Kryptonite for all those Darwinist atheists, led by Richard Dawkins, who hypocritically blame religions for imposing their superstitions on the rest of the world.

When, on 19th March 2015, I explained the Dawkinite meme on the website of the Dawkins Foundation he - or one of his adoring acolytes - soon after blocked me as a "spammer" and then (on 19.3.2013) blocked my twitter account. Clearly, in my opinion, Dawkins's behavior in this regard is not that of a proper scientist, nor is his foundation behaving like a scientific organisation, because neither appears by their behavior to be prepared to warmly embrace hard and independently verifiable disconfirming evidence for their cherished prior soft 'knowledge beliefs'.

Conclusions and the way forward

image

Disseminate only with credulous belief in himPublic Domain

Darwin is the proxy-god of his atheist Darwinists

Personally, I don't care what nonsense Darwinists such as Dawkins wish to believe about the discovery of natural selection, but I do object to them imposing their irrational beliefs in quasi-supernatural phenomena of improbable virgin cognitive conception on the history of scientific discovery. Why should they be allowed such special privileges, when they so loudly object to religions having them?

Is Dawkinite a great ironic gift from the Christian God? If highly improbably so, in my atheist opinion, might it, therefore, be gifted to the world of science, delivered by atheist apostles, as a great explanation by analogy for religious belief in that God? I have my opinion, I expect others to have theirs. Whatever, your opinion, Patrick Matthew is the true biological father of the theory of natural selection.

The hard facts of the story of Matthew. Darwin and Wallace, as told in Nullius, reveal that because the behavior of Darwinists suggests great bias towards their namesake they are totally unfit as scholars to police themselves regarding contested knowledge in the history of the discovery of natural selection.

Matthew handed "God" his redundancy notice in his book of 1831. But in later life, he employed him again when he wrote to Charles Darwin of his belief in intelligent design.

image

Trumpet from the rooftopsPublic Domain

Darwinist atheists share the same beliefs in immaculate virgin conceptions as Christians and they impose them on the history of scientific discovery

Some Final Telling Questions

Might a truly loving and cleverer than thou God use atheist Darwinists, such as Richard Dawkins, and other atheists such as I, in such mysterious ways, his self-educational wonders to perform? If so, are Patrick Matthew, Richard Dawkins and 'YoursTruly' "God's" Atheist Apostles?

For more such questions than answers from what may improbably be one of the Lord's Atheist Apostles: Follow The Seer of Gourdie Hill on Twitter .

If you think you can master it and wield it effectively, then please use Dawkinite freely and liberally so that we might all progress to a purer form of truth.

NOTE: Visit the Patrick Matthew website:Patrickmatthew.com for more information on the true biological father of natural selection

 
There are currently no comments.
 
 
Latest Thinking in Science
corner
corner
 
 
Latest Ebooks