Identity Verified Thinker in Science / Social Sciences / Sociology
Mike Sutton
Mike Sutton
Dr Mike Sutton is the author of 'Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret'.
 

Categories

This Blog has no active categories.
 
Close  

Science Fraud Inside the Darwin Industry Unearths Unpaid Debt to Forestry

Aug. 12, 2014 11:22 am

Natural selection theory was first discovered by a forester. The big data discovery that both Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace plagiarised the entire theory of natural selection from the Scottish Forrester, famous fruit farmer and businessman Patrick Matthew (see Sutton 2014) has its roots in the weirdly neglected observations of earlier writers on Matthew’s (1831) great discovery.

image

Trumpet from the rooftopsPublic Domain

Raphael Zon

Raphael Zon (1913) of the US Forest Service could not have known for sure, as we do today, that Darwin and Wallace plagiarised Matthew’s book and then committed science fraud by claiming no-prior knowledge of it, because the fact that their most powerful influencers read and then cited it is a new discovery (see Sutton 2014) made possible only with 21st century hi-technology big data research methods.

However, Zon went as far as he was able in 1913 to make the case that it could be fully understood why a forester would be first to discover natural selection. Even without the new proof of Darwin’s and Wallace’s fraud that is afforded by big data analysis, the natural conclusion of Zon’s century old thesis is that neither Darwin nor Wallace had a comparably plausible framework of expertise that can be relied upon to understand how they were supposed to have arrived ‘independently’ of Matthew at exactly the same complex theory, terminology and explanatory examples.

More than 100 years ago Zon wrote:

‘There is nothing accidental, in my opinion, in the fact that a forester should be the first to observe the struggle for existence and its bearing upon the development of the new varieties, because there is no other plant society in the world which presents a more striking example of the struggle for existence and of natural selection than the forest. Nowhere else, also, can the law of this process be more fully studied.’ (Zon 1913, p. 543).

And:

‘So perfect is the natural selection in the forest, so fine is the adjustment between the environment and the forest trees, that it is almost impossible for man to approach it, I do not mean the introduction of trees for park purposes or breeding new varieties for some other purposes than timber; I have in mind only the establishment of natural forests and the production of timber. ‘ (Zon 1913, p. 545).

And

‘Is there anything strange, therefore, that it was a forester who first formulated the principles of natural selection? Is there anything strange also, in the fact that it was also foresters who laid the foundation for what has come to be known as ecology, which is the logical development of Darwinism? Because of the fact that the forest is the highest expression of plant life, the foresters occupy the strategic position from which they command vistas accessible only with difficulty to other naturalists. In this lies the strength of forestry, its peculiar beauty, and the debt which science owes it. (Zon 1913, p. 546).

Conclusion

image

Thinker Media IncUsed only with express written permission

Nullius in Verba

The bombshell discovery of 2014 that a forester and expert hybridizing fruit tree farmer is now proven to be the sole independent discoverer of, arguably, the most important scientific discovery ever made presents those involved in the study and teaching of forestry with a unique opportunity to take their rightful place now as the best circumstance suited scholars of natural selection theory and best qualified explainers of Matthew’s unique breakthrough in arboricultural research that solved the problem of species 28 years before Darwin and Wallace stole it and then pretended it was their own.

Attribution

I would like to thank Professor Sean C. Thomas of the University of Toronto for so kindly making me first aware of Zon's excellent paper.

References

Matthew, P (1831) On Naval Timber and Arboriculture; With a critical note on authors who have recently treated the subject of planting. Edinburgh. Adam Black. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=DmYDAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q=of%20selection&f=false

Sutton, M. (2014) Nullius in Verba: Darwin’s greatest secret. Thinker Media Inc. USA.

Zon, R. (1913) Darwinism in Forestry. The American Naturalist. Vol. 47. No. 561. September. pp. 540-546.

 
Howard L. Minnick
September 7, 2014 at 12:54 pm
Thanks for another feather in Patrick Matthew's cap

Dear Dr. Sutton,

On behalf of my third Great Grandfather Patrick Matthew and my Old friend (now deceased) Jim Dempster...I wish to thank you for the contribution you have made with the publication of your latest book... "Nullius in Verba." Somehow I must find a way to get a copy so that I might fully engross myself in your findings. I would have to look into my notes but there is as I remember a Professor from the University of New Zealand who also has come to the same conclusion about Darwin and Wallace having prior knowledge of "On Naval Timber and Arboriculture" He felt that there could have possibly been as many as two copies spread among the several Naturalists who like Darwin had paid for their passage on board...and possibly a 3rd copy that could have been part of the ships' own library belonging to the ships own Naturalist on board the HMS Beagle. That entire library remained on board the ship even after it's owner had to be put ashore at Monte Vista during the voyage due to I think... a severe case of appendicitis... if memory serves me well.

Cordially,

Major Howard L. Minnick

Engr

U.S. Army

Thinker's Post
Mike Sutton
September 8, 2014 at 10:48 am

Dear Major Minnick

Many thanks for posting your comment here. This website has a link to my book, which - depending on how you order it - can be read on an ordinary PC, laptop, Kindle, Nook or Apple i-player.

The professor to whom I think you refer is Tee. He is cited in my book: Tee, G. J. (1984) Review of Patrick Matthew and Natural Selection. By W. J. Dempster. University of Auckland. New Zealand Journal of History: http://www.nzjh.auckland.ac.nz/docs/1984/NZJH_18_1_06.pdf

I'm not sure if you have read what I managed to discover about your friend, and my greatest influencer on this topic, Jim Dempster, but it can be found on BestThinking here: http://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog&blogpostid=21890%2c21890

Kindest regards

 
 
 
Latest Ebooks