Identity Verified Thinker in Politics / Forms of Government / Republic
Thomas J Donegan
Thomas J Donegan
Born January 22, 1958 Graduated 1976 Lawrence County Vo-Tech U.S.Navy, 11/76 - 10/82 Cryptologic Technician M-branch Graduated 1989 Slippery Rock University B.S. Mathematics, minors: Philosophy, History U.S. Government 1990 -2001 Various private sector Electrical/Electronics jobs 2001- present


This Blog has no active categories.
Posted in Politics / Human Rights / Impunity

Investigating Weinstein

Oct. 16, 2017 10:43 am
Keywords: None

There is precedent for the Government of the United States to investigate those things e.g., organizations, police-departments (investigating systematic racism via Obama’s unjust Department of Justice and his unjust AG Eric Holder), Universities (ostensible tolerance for campus sexual-assaults), US Military et al, which seem to either explicitly – or implicitly – promote or tolerate violations of civil rights. Consequentially, we may witness the Trump Department of Justice look into Movie mogul Harvey Weinstein, and his decades-long abuse of the women in Hollywood, and such an investigation may be much broader than merely looking into Weinstein. If such an investigation should be undertaken (This writer believes he saw a headline – on or – which asserted that an investigation had been sought by Trump’s Justice Department; we didn’t read the piece), one wonders the investigation will be limited to Weinstein? It would seem that the there may be hundreds of enablers…? If Weinstein subscribes to social conditioning it could be that he was involved in attempting to do his part to promote cultural hedonism, through movies? If so removing Weinstein from Hollywood may result in a different Hollywood movie production i.e., more family fare…?

Although that is not likely to be the result, it could so occur... Abuse of Hollywood women may be curtailed… And Hollywood may make a number of movies about the seamy side of Hollywood, but most likely the unabashed the Plutocrats-of-perversity will cut what checks may be necessary to Democratic politicians may stymie any extensive investigation. Note: perverts with money always seem to find a basket of deplorably hypocritical Democratic politicians eager to accept their money to advance dystopia, and this because dystopia advances the power of Government by making Government seem more necessary to deal with the chaos Government - in-part - promotes.

One of the interesting things about any such investigation which may result looking into Weinstein – which are demonstrably different than the investigations which Eric Holder as Obama’s AG – is that the investigations will not be launched to get political foes, to advance political agenda’s or balance historical injustices (extracting vengeance from the present generation, for their “father’s” sins); Holder and Obama couldn’t seem to resist such actions. What may prove interesting about any investigation is that it may be broadened as it develops, and that may prove to be unmanageable, meaning it could snare many on - or seemingly on - the periphery of Weinstein's affairs and practices regarding his business. … Now if such occurs, it would become even more interesting still, if a dragnet of abusers moves on to gathered up enablers, as accessories.

Such an investigation may prove to be a bit like snagging Al Capone for tax evasion, and because Weinstein didn't act in a vacuum, he had to have had a large and extensive 'support-network.' So if an investigation is enacted, and its aim is to actually root-out as many wrong-doers as possible, many besides Weinstein will be seeking attorneys. Because any legal action should aim to gather as many of those that violate the laws related to sexual predators, sexual-harassment, trafficking in sex-slaves etc. as possible, one can't help but wonder how many powerful politicians kept law-enforcement away for Mr. Weinstein...? And it may be that certain people e.g., Bill and Hillary Clinton, POTUS Donald Trump (friends with convicted Jeffrey Epstein; convicted Billionaire pedophile. Note that both Clintons have been to Epstein’s island numerous times and that Donald Trump - too - has spent time on Epstein's island… If Trump allows this investigation, it would seem to indicate his hands are clean...), may all be snagged up in such an investigation and possibly end with them being proximate to each other - behind bars - for a very long time...

Thomas J. Donegan

There are currently no comments. to Shut Down Permanently on December 31, 2017

If you want to save a copy of your content, you must do so before the website shuts down on December 31, 2017. We will NOT be able to provide any assistance after the website shuts down. We are available at only until the shutdown to provide more information and assistance.

It was a noble 10-year experiment, but it turns out that the writers with the best content are the least adept at the tech required to publish under our model, which in hindsight, makes perfect sense. If you are dedicating your life to becoming an expert in your specialty, you don’t have a lot of time left for figuring out publishing tech.

It hasn't helped that we have entered an age of unprecedented polarization and antagonism which doesn't foster demand for a website dedicated to the respectful engagement of diverse views.

Thank you, everyone!

Latest Thinking in Politics & Government
Latest Ebooks