Identity Verified Thinker in Politics / Elections / National
Phil Hands
Phil Hands
Phil Hands is an editorial cartoonist, illustrator and writer from Madison, Wisconsin. A fierce political moderate, Phil is not afraid to call out the radicals partisans in either party. In his spare time, Phil enjoys drinking coffee, eating cheese and being cold.


This Blog has no active categories.
Posted in Politics / Elections / National

Both Barack Obama and Donald Trump are inspirational figures

Aug. 16, 2017 11:34 pm
Categories: None
Keywords: None
Thomas J Donegan
August 21, 2017 at 1:01 pm
Inspirational figures...?

Inspirational figures...?

Hi Phil!

Trump may be an execrable fellow, he seems to be an execrable fellow, but he may largely be a victim of a collective propaganda campaign, as George W. Bush was. One can only really know what another advocates; the things he advocates are actually in line with the long-term interests of the USA. Trump neither advocates for the murdering of babies under any and all circumstances - as the "inspirational" Obama* does - nor does Trump favor black-lives over lives of all people. Obama, Hillary and the DNC prefer the "black-lives matter" crowd to domestic tranquility and to lives of policemen. All lives should be held as sacrosanct black, white, red, yellow, heterosexual and homosexual, and even the lives of policemen and women... If the social-political Left actually cared about human life they would seek public and moral dialogue with their ostensible oppressors, but the social-political Left tacitly or explicitly disavow objective morality - thus inalienable Rights - and thus any possibility for resolution of conflict via common-ground; since objective moral principles are the path - or means - by which one may 'form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare and secure the blessings of Liberty...' The social-political Left's agenda seems to be to destroy their opposition by any means possible...

* Caveat: if Obama could know that the baby would fall into the category of LGBTQ - or perhaps was an advocate of Sharia supremacism (term Andrew McCarthy @ the National Review coined; the term argues that even secular Muslims prefer Sharia law over the U.S. Constitution) - then maybe Obama may favor the life of the baby...

That Trump may have inadequately condemned the KKK and Neo-Nazi’s in Charlottesville likely has less to do with Trump’s sympathy for those groups, and more with Trump not being a sophisticate. Trump ostensibly has a significantly higher IQ than Bill Clinton who had a significantly higher IQ than Obama, but intelligence is not always accompanied by a sense of moral comity, kindness, empathy and regard for the sensibilities which ought to be given deference; the genius (we are not claiming Trump a genius, although his reputed IQ says he is a genius) may be quite insuperable e.g., Évariste Galois (dead @ 20, considered one of 5 Great mathematicians; he was an impatient hothead; Galois was manipulated into a duel in which he too late found he was defending the honor of a prostitute...)… Additionally, Trump likely feels he is under siege, and for winning the Presidency fair-and-square, but he and his people are being persecuted by smoke, mirrors and an extremely tendentious Press. The same Press that celebrated the real scandals of Obama and Clinton are today working with a corrupt leftist bureaucracy in what seems to be an attempted coup. Their narrative relies upon ill-informed, un-informed and stupid sentimentalists to keep the narrative going. My guess is that not a single Trump critic could change places with him – confront the same daily attacks – and perform anywhere near as well under those same conditions, but the Press, the social-political Left and the DNC defend and mischaracterize the actions of their own (those which may advance the evil power-acquisition - by whatever means necessary - agenda of the social-political Leftist); portraying abject wickedness as the good. Such makes it makes it easy for an Obama, a Pelosi, a Clinton, a Reid, a Schumer, Schiff to look the American people in the eye and lie with impunity; the Press will never hold them accountable, thus giving tacit validation to the particular pols lies...

And let us state this once again (as we have stated numerous times in our blog-posts, and yet never encountering a challenge to the claim...): All ideologues are Leftists! Hitler and his gang denied objective reality, objective morality and God just like Josef Stalin & Mao Zedong. Hitler may have been a Nationalist – and the Aryan’s may have embraced Nationalism, but they were all social-political Leftists; differing not in kind, but in degree from Obama, Hillary, Harry Reid, Pelosi et al. The Democratic Party is also the Party of slavery, and the KKK e.g., Grand Kleagle Robert C. Byrd Democrat Senator, deceased. Those neo-Nazi's and KKK members may not know it, but they are sentimental cousins of those they are warring with from the social-political Left; violence is germane to ideologues, because objective morality is meaningless; thus "justice" is reverted to its pre-Socratic form, viz: "Harm one's enemies, help ones friends." Thus, as the inspirational Obama stated: "If Our Opponents Bring Knife to a Fight, 'We Bring a Gun'"

Our observation is thus: "If Americans were possessed of an objectively moral worldview, and the truth were then told to such people about Obama and Trump, Trump may not inspire because of his moral flaws, but Obama wouldn't inspire because Americans would have come to understand Obama's ostensible "virtues" as wicked vices (a bit redundant? perhaps...), thus only those which hold evil as good, and good as evil would be inspired by Obama. Moreover, if all American's acquired an objectively moral worldview, the Press - which too would have that view - would present Obama from that perspective and he wouldn't have been electable! And neither would damn near any Democrat politician that is breathing today.

Cheers, Phil!



Latest Ebooks