Identity Verified Thinker in Politics / Elections / National
Paul A Duginski
Paul A Duginski
Paul Duginski is a political cartoonist and veteran newspaper staff artist. He enjoys reading history, literature and going bodyboarding whenever he has time.


This Blog has no active categories.
Posted in Politics / Elections / National

Arms and the Man

Apr. 14, 2017 2:35 pm
Categories: None

The “hard power” budget unveiled by President Trump last month proposes to boost military spending at the expense of many projects on the home front. Pretty soon, the Defense Department will find that there is nothing left at home to defend. It also proposes to slash the budgets for foreign aid and the United Nations.

The budget is intended to "send a message to our allies and our potential adversaries that this is a strong-power administration," according to Mick Mulvaney, Trump’s anti-establishment director of the Office of Management and Budget. Mulvaney was a founding member of the extremist House Freedom Caucus, in case you’re wondering where he’s coming from. He was elected to Congress as part of the so-called “tea party” wave.

So, in other words, we’re talking cuckoo.

And I think the world has already gotten the memo about U.S. “strong power.”

The United States spends about $610 billion a year on defense, according to the Peter G. Peterson Foundation. That’s more than China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, France, the United Kingdom, India and Germany combined. Those countries spend a total of $601 billion.

In order to boost defense spending, here are just a few of the agencies and programs from the long list that Trump would defund entirely: Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Legal Services Corporation, National Endowment for the Humanities, McGovern-Dole International Food for Education program, Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant program, Community Development Block Grant program, Job training grants, Global Climate Change Initiative and Green Climate Fund and the Essential Air Service program, which provides subsidized commercial air service to rural airports.

That’s just a sample from the list.

When the Pentagon battens on the budgets of programs that benefit the people at home, it hollows out our country like a North Korea. We don’t live for our defense, we defend ourselves to live. The military shouldn’t rule us.

Other programs, such as foreign aid and money for the U.N. can be humanitarian, accomplishing our foreign policy goals without resorting to war, although from the sounds of it, the simplistic Trump is spoiling for war.

I can truly say that I support a strong defense. The U.S. military is the best in the world and we should keep it that way. But under Trump, the Pentagon comes off as the proverbial rich guy who never has enough and always wants more.

There are currently no comments. to Shut Down Permanently on December 31, 2017

If you want to save a copy of your content, you must do so before the website shuts down on December 31, 2017. We will NOT be able to provide any assistance after the website shuts down. We are available at only until the shutdown to provide more information and assistance.

It was a noble 10-year experiment, but it turns out that the writers with the best content are the least adept at the tech required to publish under our model, which in hindsight, makes perfect sense. If you are dedicating your life to becoming an expert in your specialty, you don’t have a lot of time left for figuring out publishing tech.

It hasn't helped that we have entered an age of unprecedented polarization and antagonism which doesn't foster demand for a website dedicated to the respectful engagement of diverse views.

Thank you, everyone!

Latest Thinking in Politics & Government
Latest Ebooks