Article in Society / Philosophy / Political & Social
As societies and social systems grow in complexity and scope, the need for a coherent approach to provide pragmatic solutions and inter-related views becomes paramount.

As societies and social systems grow in complexity and scope, the need for a coherent approach to provide pragmatic solutions and inter-related views becomes paramount. Respectively, if we look at the real world system as a physical or organizational one, developing new models may take into consideration systems structures devoid of the creation of arbitrary internal boundaries. Literature tells us that social systems encompass a large and relatively amorphous body of methods and principles, all oriented to look at the interrelatedness of different forces and yet part of a common process. All of these diverse approaches seem to have one guiding idea in common: that the behavior of all systems follows certain general principles. They appear rooted in the systems dynamic understanding of how complex feedback processes can generate problematic patterns of behavior within organizations and large-scale human systems.

How will we unlock the enigmas of social thought and cultural understanding based on the theoretical constructs and ruminations presented to us by theorists? Is it even possible to do so taking into consideration all the presented elements working against such an attempt? We may want to debate the nature of the principles of social systems ranging from the curious to the profound and create provocative dialogue among future theorists, focusing on efforts to create true understanding and communication. We may want to synthesize insights gained from past theories, history, and our own observations to present a new paradigm. We may want to forget old stereotypical ideas and assumptions and look at current state-of-the-art discoveries and ideas assisting us in the search for new answers and fresh theories.

If social systems truly are a realm where ideas about multiple dimensions and problematic situations harbor, we have an opportunity to explore and produce new domains, each with its own distinct set of characteristics and possibilities.

Cassard, A. (2009) Baltimore Women in Leadership Examiner to Shut Down Permanently on December 31, 2017

If you want to save a copy of your content, you must do so before the website shuts down on December 31, 2017. We will NOT be able to provide any assistance after the website shuts down. We are available at only until the shutdown to provide more information and assistance.

It was a noble 10-year experiment, but it turns out that the writers with the best content are the least adept at the tech required to publish under our model, which in hindsight, makes perfect sense. If you are dedicating your life to becoming an expert in your specialty, you don’t have a lot of time left for figuring out publishing tech.

It hasn't helped that we have entered an age of unprecedented polarization and antagonism which doesn't foster demand for a website dedicated to the respectful engagement of diverse views.

Thank you, everyone!

Anita M Cassard, Ph.D. Identity Verified

About the Author 

Anita M Cassard, Ph.D.
Anita M. Cassard, Ph.D., is an expert in the practical application of leadership and management styles/theories, with over 20 years of domes

Recent Content by Anita M Cassard, Ph.D.

Aside from income, how might we define and measure other dimensions of extreme poverty?

Indicators of poverty used by the World Bank, the WHO, and similar organizations are no longer sufficient nor do they represent a true picture of global poverty.

A Fool's Observations

A philosophical look at juxta positions exposing the preceived from the real.

Social Change as Developmental Dialectic Process

Bhaskar’s concept of dialectic universalizability forms the foundation for his moral realism on which he developed his dialectic critical realist system.

Latest Ebooks