Article in Lifestyle / Health & Fitness / Beauty & Skin Care
I’ve given up on mainstream antiperspirant and have started using natural deodorant. I can do better than yellow-stained shirts and questionable protection, and I can do so because the market grants me choices.
 
 
 

Bernie Sanders famously said: “You don't necessarily need a choice of 23 underarm spray deodorants…”

Well, I’m glad there is choice. You see, I’ve given up on mainstream antiperspirant. I can do better than yellow-stained shirts and questionable protection, and I can do so because the market grants me choices.

The beginning of the end came as I stood in the grocery aisle staring at the amazing number of options from which to choose. Should I get the 48-hour version, or the 96? Clearly there is no way a mere 24-hour stick could possibly do the trick. What about the clinical version? Is my situation really that bad?

I must not be alone, for the clinical strength section of the aisle just seems to keep getting bigger every time I visit. The whole thing gives a new spin on the idea of an “arms race.” Sure, I have found it odd that antiperspirants continue to increase in strength to address a population that is likely not all mountain climbers and lumberjacks, but who was I to weigh in on what may very well be a body odor epidemic?

Wracked with indecision and insecurity about my failings as a human, I happened to see a different section that must have just been added–natural deodorants.

Now, for as long as I have known of their existence I have been skeptical of the effectiveness of these health food store products. My experience in years past was that those who wore them should have invested in something stronger. But here was a variety of options that I had never seen before in my “normal” store. Plus, I had always assumed I needed the “maximum protection” of the strongest possible antiperspirant, so to switch to a deodorant of any kind would be a radical change.

Natural deodorant offerings are not just competing against regular deodorants, but antiperspirants, as well.

What exactly is “natural” deodorant? Basically the idea is to avoid a number of the chemicals often found in traditional deodorants. These mainly include Triclosan and Parabens. The FDA considers Triclosan to be a pesticide; deodorant manufacturers use it to kill body-odor causing bacteria. Parabens are preservatives in a wide range of products that have estrogen-like properties and some studies have linked them to breast cancer.

But as natural deodorant company Schmidt’s admits, “natural deodorant had a reputation for being ineffective.” Their pledge was to create a product without these ingredients that still worked just as well.

I looked them over and felt conflicted. On the one hand, I knew that my current regimen involves an unsatisfying collection of antiperspirants that I rotate through in order to “stay fresh.” On the other hand, would I just be another “natural” dude who smelled?

As I have thought about it since, I reached the conclusion that the natural deodorant offerings are not just competing against regular deodorants, but antiperspirants, as well. This is because virtually all antiperspirants contain some variant of aluminum salt, the ingredient that blocks the duct from which sweat comes.

Years ago this was linked to overblown cancer scares. Nonetheless the rumors persist despite no real basis in medical evidence. Deodorants catering to the “natural” crowd, then, have followed a different technological path, developing workarounds to help absorb wetness rather than block it.

In the end, I grabbed one natural version with a pleasant woodsy smell that uses essential oils and plant-based powders. I also picked up another new version of antiperspirant that claimed it would put an end to yellow stains.

My new lifestyle is the result of an increase in consumer choice, not its restriction.

Little did I know at the time, but the ingredient that causes yellow stains on shirts is–you guessed it–the aluminum found in nearly every antiperspirant on the market. Worse, because antiperspirants tend to leave a residue on clothing, the sense that we need to switch antiperspirants often may have less to do with our body chemistry adapting to specific fragrances, and more to do with what odors are getting trapped in our shirts.

So, I decided to give the natural version the first try. I haven’t used anything else since, and it’s been about a month. Whereas I previously felt my 48-hour antiperspirant could barely make it through a standard workday, I’ve had no issues with feeling fresh throughout the day with a simple deodorant. And, whereas I embarrassingly used to check my undershirts after washing to see if they needed another cycle I no longer need to. If they smell like anything other than detergent now it’s my deodorant–not something less pleasant.

While I might not be ready to call for the elimination of underarm options as some politicians have suggested, I am confident I will not be going back to antiperspirant anytime soon. And, I am happy to acknowledge that my new lifestyle is the result of an increase in consumer choice, not its restriction. No congressional committees or executive orders were involved in the opening of shelf space to natural deodorant options. The store buyers were no doubt simply responding to consumer demand. And now you can free yourself from the antiperspirant racket, too.

So raise your arms with confidence–you have nothing to lose but your stains!

This article was originally published on FEE.org. Read the original article.

 
Matthew Hisrich Credentials Verified

About the Author 

Matthew Hisrich
Matthew Hisrich received his MDiv in teaching and theology from the Earlham School of Religion, where he now serves as Director of Recruitme

Recent Content by Matthew Hisrich

The odd triumphalism of consequentialist ethics in election season

Each election cycle brings with it an opportunity to study the way in which classic ethical positions play out in public discourse. Of particular interest is the persuasive power of consequentialist ethics as a voting nears. Consequentialist ethics - such as utilitarianism - suggest that...

“Preacher, tell them that Satan is real, too”: Connecting Rothbard’s Conceptual Realism and Quaker Notions

Recently in reading through Murray Rothbard’s Man, Economy, and State , I came across an interesting concept with possible relevance for religious practice. In critiquing the economic thought of some others, he explains that a common fallacy is to engage in “conceptual realism.” This he defines...

Beautiful Anarchy: Caputo, the state, and the denial of the future

John Caputo’s writing has had a profound impact on my understanding of theology. His articulation of the nature and action of God in the world and how we are to understand our own roles, agency, and salvation have provided me with beautiful ways to refresh and enliven my faith. That being said,...

Yes, I Do Need Two Dozen Deodorant Choices

I’ve given up on mainstream antiperspirant and have started using natural deodorant. I can do better than yellow-stained shirts and questionable protection, and I can do so because the market grants me choices.

A Homestead Act for Local Economic Development

How applying the logic of the 1862 Homestead Act to local economic development might improve the chances of success for such efforts.

Are abatements a win-win?

A discussion of the economic research surrounding tax abatements and incentives as local economic development tools.

 
 
Latest Ebooks