Identity Verified Thinker in Business / Industries / Pharmaceuticals
Dennis Lendrem
Dennis Lendrem
MSc in Medical Statistics, PhD from Oxford. Background in Pharmaceutical R&D. Contributor to popular magazines and trade magazines including Scrip Magazine, New Scientist and the Economist. Formerly Editor of the journal Pharmaceutical Statistics.
 

Prototyping and Fast-Fail Strategies

Oct. 16, 2011 11:32 am

When end users get involved in the final stages of testing, light bulbs go on, and they often have an "aha" moment. Unfortunately, that is often too late.

Frank R. Parth

Prototyping is as an example of a fast-fail strategy in action. And such fast fail strategies increase R&D productivity by clearing the development pipeline of flawed or failing products.

When prototyping we don’t expect the prototype to work. It is not the finished product. But by prototyping, the developer gets rapid feedback on what will work and what won’t; those features that are useful and those which will never be used. We want to learn what works and what doesn't and move on.

Often the user is unable to externalize their needs, to verbalize or express their needs. However, the user knows what they like.

“I may not know much about art, but I know what I like.”

Prototyping allows the user to better express their needs. And the user provides valuable feedback to the developer allowing undreamt of features to be incorporated into the next release. It is a partnership endeavour. Companies must seek to engage a partner who can help us define our needs.

This approach does not always sit well with the old-school “customer-vendor” mentality. This more traditional approach begins with the user developing a detailed specification. This can be a lengthy process. The user is often ill-equipped to develop the specification. This specification is then offered to tender. When invited to tender, those with integrity will attempt to alert the customer to inadequacies or deficiencies in the specification. Sadly, this is not something the customer wishes to hear. And these companies are usually not awarded the contract. Instead, the preferred solution provider delivers exactly what the customer asked for - often within budget and on time. However, they make their money once the real users encounter the product for the first time and the inadequacy of the specification becomes apparent to all.

image

Special thanks to thingsdesigner.com for a variation on tree swing. Public Domain

The Art of Specification. The system as a) what the customer asked for, b) as agreed in the functional specification, c) as implemented by the team on the ground, and d) what the customer needed. Note that most of the "fixes" in c) were unbudgeted and doubled the cost of the project. Note also that the solution is unstable and requires constant support. Furthermore, note that solution d) is the design recommended by the firm who were not awarded the contract.

 
There are currently no comments.
 

BestThinking to be Updated this Weekend

If all goes well you will see a change in the layout of BestThinking's Home and Category pages. Topics & Articles and Blogs & Books will no longer be shown in two separate columns.

All 4 content types (Articles, Blogs, Books, and Topics) will be Featured Content together as one continuous stream, although the column structure - one wide and one narrow - will remain the same. The first (wide) column will now flow into the second (narrow) column. This change is in response to Blogs becoming as important a content type as Articles and Topics. This will also give Featured Content more time on the Home page which is helpful regarding search engines indexing this content.

Close
 
Latest Ebooks