<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title type="text">The Blog of David Y Denholm</title><subtitle type="text">The Blog of David Y Denholm</subtitle><id>david-y-denholm</id><updated>2009-07-02T15:02:19-04:00</updated><author><name>David Y Denholm</name><uri>http://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/economics/labor_economics/david-y-denholm</uri></author><link rel="alternate" href="http://www.bestthinking.com/feeds/thinkerblog/david-y-denholm" /><entry xml:base="http://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/economics/labor_economics/david-y-denholm?tab=blog&amp;item=2780"><id>http://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/economics/labor_economics/david-y-denholm?tab=blog&amp;item=2780</id><title type="text">Best Thinking</title><published>2009-07-02T15:02:19-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-02T15:02:19-04:00</updated><author><name>David Y Denholm</name><uri>http://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/economics/labor_economics/david-y-denholm</uri></author><link rel="alternate" href="http://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/economics/labor_economics/david-y-denholm?tab=blog&amp;item=2780" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;There's an element of genius in the idea of a web site called "Best Thinking." Who wouldn't sign up for something in which their thinking might be portrayed as the best? The idea is grandiose until you consider whether it is your thinking that is the best, or whether the thinking you promote is the best of which you are capable, whether it is any good or not. Either way it is still the "Best Thinking." I love it.&lt;/p&gt;</content></entry></feed>