Article in Science / Social Sciences / Sociology
Based as it is on a simple truism and five fallacies: equivocation; ambiguity; precognition; post hoc ergo propter hoc; and the ‘social absolute’ the notion of 'opportunity' , which is central to so called ‘Crime as Opportunity Theory’, cannot logically be a cause of crime.
 
 

Description: Show Description Basic RAT Triangle
Media Type: jpeg
File Size: 44 KB
Attribution: All Rights Reserved
Full Resolution: Download Original

Description: Show Description Three Triangles Are In Fact Within the Classic Rat Triangle
Media Type: jpeg
File Size: 89 KB
Attribution: Dysology.org Dr Mike Sutton
Full Resolution: Download Original

Description: Show Description Fig 2: Three Triangles Lay Hidden Within the Classic RAT Crime Triangle
Media Type: jpeg
File Size: 89 KB
Attribution: Copyright Dysology.org Dr Mike Sutton
Full Resolution: Download Original

Description: Show Description The Latest RAT Crime Triangle
Media Type: jpeg
File Size: 50 KB
Full Resolution: Download Original

Description: Show Description Fig 3 The Latest RAT Crime Triangle
Media Type: jpeg
File Size: 50 KB
Full Resolution: Download Original

Description: Show Description Figure 4 -
Media Type: jpeg
File Size: 50 KB
Attribution: Copyright Dr Mike Sutton. All rights reserved
Full Resolution: Download Original

Media Type: jpeg
File Size: 79 KB
Attribution: A Real Opportunity
Full Resolution: Download Original

There are currently no saved videos.
There is currently no saved audio.
There are currently no saved documents.
Mike Sutton Identity Verified

About the Author 

Mike Sutton
Dr Mike Sutton is the author of 'Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret'.

Recent Content by Mike Sutton

Naming Jack the Ripper II: Whoops a Michaelmas Daisy: DNA Mistake -News Update

In an earlier book review blog I pointed out the possibility of science fraud and negligent DNA analysis errors regarding the claims made by the author of a new best selling book that he has solved the case of Jack the Ripper. It seems I was right - at least in the very general sense - of there...

But I'm one of THEM not one of you - honestly. Look, can you not see my inner lizard?

I thought having fanatical Darwinist groupies write nonsense about me being a conspiracy theorist was bad enough - particularly when it is they and not I that see conspiracies where there is zero evidence of them (Sutton 2014): 'Perhaps he simply had no choice but to give Matthew's book the...

A Living Fossil of Pre-Enlightenment Thinking Discovered Alive Today in the USA Smithsonian!

Call me a heretic if you will, but I do know for a fact that, ever since the great time when the intellectual Enlightenment movement of the 17th century shaped modern science and scholarship that institutions of veracious knowledge are supposed to weigh all knowledge on its merits, rather than...

Sutton's A-Z of Big Data Busted Myths

New Big Data internet technology allows us to search millions of documents in an instant to determine the veracity of current knowledge about the published origins of words, terms phrases idioms and their related concepts.

After the Big Data Bombshell: Can Darwin’s and Wallace’s Claims to Independent Discovery Remain Vertical?

This article informs natural scientists of the discovery of new data that proves Darwin and Wallace did not discover natural selection independently of Matthew's prior published discovery of 1831. Moreover, it supports new claims that Darwin and Wallace committed the world's greatest science fraud.

Internet Dating with Darwin: New Discovery that Darwin and Wallace were Influenced by Matthew's Prior-Discovery

Contrary to current Darwinist knowledge beliefs, Matthew's 1831 book, revealing and detailing his discovery of natural selection, was cited before 1858 by three naturalists who played key pre-1858 roles in facilitating and influencing Darwin’s and Wallace’s published ideas on natural selection

 
Latest Ebooks